🍽 RiskyEats

Inspection history ยท Turnover analysis

Descriptive Counts and statistics from the public record. Glossary →

Bay Restaurant Intelligence

Per-county FRI pressure detail pages.

Bay has 2 active licenses, 0.0% closure pressure, and 0.00 closures per 10K residents. This county deep-dive isolates local survival pressure with rate and per-capita context, so a small county losing several places is not read the same way as a large metro losing the same raw count.

Share + credit: f Facebook ๐• Post in LinkedIn โ†‘ Reddit โœ‰ Email Please credit RiskyEats / FRI Analytics when sharing.

Updated 2026-07-28 15:36 UTC

Active licenses2
Delinquent licenses (DBPR 45/46)0
Closure rate0.0%
Delinquent / 10K pop0.00
Emergency-order rate0.9%
Anomaly flags on record0

Counts here are DBPR licenses in delinquent/inactive status (Primary Status Code 45 or 46) -- a public-record regulatory state, not a confirmed business closure. This delinquent population is much larger than the metro Closures dimension's confirmed-closed count, which additionally requires Google/news/field corroboration. A delinquent license is not by itself proof the business has shut.

Charts

Inspections per month
2025-08 181.0 143.9090909090909
2025-09 130.0 143.9090909090909
2025-10 168.0 143.9090909090909
2025-11 85.0 143.9090909090909
2025-12 136.0 143.9090909090909
2026-01 132.0 143.9090909090909
2026-02 171.0 143.9090909090909
2026-03 196.0 143.9090909090909
2026-04 194.0 143.9090909090909
2026-05 148.0 143.9090909090909
2026-06 42.0 143.9090909090909
2026-07 115.0 143.9090909090909

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Delinquent licenses (DBPR 45/46) per month
2025-08 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-09 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-10 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-11 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-12 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-01 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-02 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-03 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-04 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-05 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-06 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-07 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top kill-zone neighborhoods

Source window has zero qualifying records for this table.

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top oversaturated cuisines

Source window has zero qualifying records for this table.

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top same-address churn locations

Open
606-B COMMERCE DR Panama City Beach 37 79 46.8% ›
606 B COMMERCE DR Panama City Beach 33 74 44.6% ›
4114 JAN COOLEY DR Panama City Beach 14 59 23.7%
606-B COMMERCE DRIVE Panama City Beach 14 35 40.0%
606B COMMERCE DR Panama City Beach 13 29 44.8%

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: Inspection history ยท Turnover analysis. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records โ€” no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.