🍽 RiskyEats

Inspection history ยท Turnover analysis

Descriptive Counts and statistics from the public record. Glossary →

Escambia Restaurant Intelligence

Per-county FRI pressure detail pages.

Escambia has 1 active licenses, 0.0% closure pressure, and 0.00 closures per 10K residents. This county deep-dive isolates local survival pressure with rate and per-capita context, so a small county losing several places is not read the same way as a large metro losing the same raw count.

Share + credit: f Facebook ๐• Post in LinkedIn โ†‘ Reddit โœ‰ Email Please credit RiskyEats / FRI Analytics when sharing.

Updated 2026-07-28 15:36 UTC

Active licenses1
Delinquent licenses (DBPR 45/46)0
Closure rate0.0%
Delinquent / 10K pop0.00
Emergency-order rate1.1%
Anomaly flags on record0

Counts here are DBPR licenses in delinquent/inactive status (Primary Status Code 45 or 46) -- a public-record regulatory state, not a confirmed business closure. This delinquent population is much larger than the metro Closures dimension's confirmed-closed count, which additionally requires Google/news/field corroboration. A delinquent license is not by itself proof the business has shut.

Charts

Inspections per month
2025-08 166.0 144.1818181818182
2025-09 187.0 144.1818181818182
2025-10 196.0 144.1818181818182
2025-11 101.0 144.1818181818182
2025-12 94.0 144.1818181818182
2026-01 137.0 144.1818181818182
2026-02 110.0 144.1818181818182
2026-03 198.0 144.1818181818182
2026-04 174.0 144.1818181818182
2026-05 197.0 144.1818181818182
2026-06 26.0 144.1818181818182
2026-07 125.0 144.1818181818182

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Delinquent licenses (DBPR 45/46) per month
2025-08 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-09 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-10 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-11 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2025-12 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-01 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-02 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-03 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-04 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-05 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-06 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00
2026-07 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.00

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top kill-zone neighborhoods

Source window has zero qualifying records for this table.

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top oversaturated cuisines

Source window has zero qualifying records for this table.

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Top same-address churn locations
3670 BARRANCAS AVE Pensacola 21 62 33.9%
4051 BARRANCAS AVE UNIT C Pensacola 20 37 54.1%
201 E GREGORY ST Pensacola 15 77 19.5%
2301 N PACE BLVD Pensacola 13 37 35.1%

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: Inspection history ยท Turnover analysis. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records โ€” no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.