RiskyEats

License records

Official records + calculations Counts and statistics derived from cited public records. Definitions →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Updated 2026-09-30 15:05 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts

Most-active districts. 7 plotted observations, ranging from 77382.00 to 232898.00. Open the data table for exact values.

Interactive chart loading; the data table below is the accessible fallback.

View data table

District trends

D4 232898 242047 1.04 3431
D3 193159 173198 0.90 6437
D2 182799 214422 1.17 4224
D1 158412 144980 0.92 2005
D5 132561 165577 1.25 4087
D7 121888 106916 0.88 1759
D6 77382 43146 0.56 1546

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records — no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.

Share: Facebook X LinkedIn Email