RiskyEats

License records

Official records + calculations Counts and statistics derived from cited public records. Definitions →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Updated 2026-08-31 14:35 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts

Most-active districts. 7 plotted observations, ranging from 76626.00 to 229860.00. Open the data table for exact values.

Interactive chart loading; the data table below is the accessible fallback.

View data table

District trends

D4 229860 239256 1.04 3369
D3 190747 171441 0.90 6364
D2 180722 211446 1.17 4169
D1 156085 142737 0.91 1977
D5 130905 163450 1.25 3999
D7 120308 105633 0.88 1746
D6 76626 42804 0.56 1532

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records — no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.

Share: Facebook X LinkedIn Email