License records

Descriptive Counts and statistics from the public record. Glossary →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Share + credit: f Facebook 𝕏 Post in LinkedIn ↑ Reddit ✉ Email Please credit RiskyEats / FRI Analytics when sharing.

Updated 2026-07-07 14:48 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts
D4 224671
D3 186598
D2 176744
D1 151919
D5 127800
D7 117553
D6 74974

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

District trends
D4 224671 234246 1.04 3265
D3 186598 168155 0.90 6211
D2 176744 205615 1.16 4049
D1 151919 138669 0.91 1884
D5 127800 159150 1.25 3868
D7 117553 103069 0.88 1707
D6 74974 42095 0.56 1511

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records — no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.