🍽 RiskyEats

License records

Descriptive Counts and statistics from the public record. Glossary →

Inspector District Trends

Inspection activity, citation spikes, and potential coverage gaps by district.

Inspector-district activity separates restaurant risk from coverage intensity. IRL needs this credibility check: high citation counts can mean risky operators, stricter inspectors, heavier coverage, or all three.

Share + credit: f Facebook 𝕏 Post in LinkedIn ↑ Reddit ✉ Email Please credit RiskyEats / FRI Analytics when sharing.

Updated 2026-05-22 15:03 UTC

Charts

Most-active districts

514190
D4 27284
D2 23329
D3 21781
D1 19772
D5 16534
D7 14994
D6 9225

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

District trends

514190 0 0.00 0
D4 27284 24900 0.91 485
D2 23329 29868 1.28 649
D3 21781 17333 0.80 653
D1 19772 19799 1.00 385
D5 16534 19545 1.18 516
D7 14994 11710 0.78 221
D6 9225 3386 0.37 125

Raw counts mislead -- Putnam County losing 4 places is different from Miami losing 4. Use the rate or per-capita column for defensible comparisons. Methodology details linked above.

Data sources: License records. Built from DBPR public inspection records, Florida Sunbiz business filings, and Foursquare/OSS location data. All counts are derived from public records — no estimates or projections unless labeled as forecast.